In Collins v. Yellin (previously captioned Collins v. Mnuchin), the U.S. Supreme Court, relying on its decision in Seila Law, held that the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s structure was unconstitutional because the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) only allowed the President to remove the FHFA’s Director “for cause.” … Continue Reading
collins
SCOTUS decision on FHFA’s constitutionality could provide support for validity of pre-Seila Law CFPB actions
In its decision earlier this week in Collins v. Yellin (previously captioned Collins v. Mnuchin), the U.S. Supreme Court, relying on its decision in Seila Law, held that the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s structure is unconstitutional because the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 only allows the President to remove the FHFA’s Director “for cause.” … Continue Reading
SCOTUS agrees to hear case on FHFA’s constitutionality with implications for CFPB’s pre-Seila Law actions
On July 9, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the two petitions for certiorari in Collins v. Mnuchin, the en banc Fifth Circuit decision which held that the FHFA’s structure is unconstitutional because the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) only allows the President to remove the FHFA’s Director “for cause.” … Continue Reading
No action from SCOTUS on Collins cert petitions
The orders released today by the U.S. Supreme Court from its January 10 conference did not include any orders regarding the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the plaintiffs in Collins v. Mnuchin or the petition filed by the FHFA and Treasury Department. The case dockets indicated that briefing on the petitions was submitted for last Friday’s conference.… Continue Reading
SCOTUS to consider Collins cert petitions on Jan. 10
At its conference this Friday, January 10, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to consider the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the plaintiffs in Collins v. Mnuchin and the petition filed by the FHFA and Treasury Department. The case dockets indicate that briefing on the petitions was submitted for Friday’s conference.… Continue Reading
Fifth Circuit panel in All American Check Cashing asks parties to brief impact of en banc Fifth Circuit decision holding FHFA structure unconstitutional
The issue of the CFPB’s constitutionality is currently before the Fifth Circuit in the interlocutory appeal of All American Check Cashing from the district court’s ruling upholding the CFPB’s constitutionality. Oral argument was held in March 2019 and no decision has yet been issued.
At oral argument, the panel asked the parties whether it should hold its decision until the en banc court issued its decision in Collins v.… Continue Reading
FHFA reverses position (again) on its constitutionality
In an interesting twist, the FHFA has informed the Fifth Circuit in Collins v. Mnuchin, that despite having previously advised the en banc court that it would not defend the FHFA’s constitutionality, it has reconsidered its position under the leadership of its new Director and will take the position going forward that the agency’s structure is constitutional. … Continue Reading
Petitions for rehearing en banc filed in Fifth Circuit case finding FHFA is unconstitutionally structured
In July 2018, in Collins v. Mnuchin, a Fifth Circuit panel found that the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is unconstitutionally structured because it is excessively insulated from Executive Branch oversight. It determined that the appropriate remedy for the constitutional violation was to sever the provision of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) that only allows the President to remove the FHFA Director “for cause” while “leav[ing] intact the remainder of HERA and the FHFA’s past actions.”… Continue Reading