Usury

Subscribe to Usury via RSS

The en banc proceedings in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser continue to attract significant attention. On June 4, 2026, the attorneys general of Utah and 20 other states filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit to affirm the district court’s decision enjoining Colorado’s attempt to utilize its opt out pursuant to Section 525 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (DIDMCA) as a basis to regulate the interest rates charged to Colorado borrowers by out -of-state state banks.… Continue Reading

On June 4, 2026, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) filed an amicus brief in the en banc proceedings pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser, strongly supporting the plaintiffs-appellees’ challenge to Colorado’s attempt to apply its usury laws to loans made by out-of-state, state-chartered banks.… Continue Reading

On June 4, 2026, the American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute, Consumer Bankers Association, America’s Credit Unions, and 52 state bankers associations filed a supplemental amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs in the en banc proceeding pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in National Association of Industrial Bankers v.… Continue Reading

In a very significant and potentially precedent-setting February 24, 2026 decision, the Los Angeles County Superior Court (Hon. Gary D. Roberts) issued a tentative decision granting summary judgment in favor of Opportunity Financial, LLC (“OppFi”) and against the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (“DFPI”). The ruling rejects the DFPI’s claim that OppFi was the “true lender” of certain loans originated by Utah-chartered FinWise Bank and therefore subject to California’s 36% interest rate cap under the California Financing Law (CFL), as amended by AB 539.… Continue Reading

Very soon, briefing by the parties in the 10th Circuit will commence with respect to Colorado’s appeal of a preliminary injunction entered by the Federal District Court for the District of Colorado. The District Court enjoined the Colorado Attorney General and UCCC Administrator from applying to out-of-state, state banks making loans to Colorado residents its (1) recently enacted statute opting out of Section 521 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (the “DIDMCA”) (conferring on state-chartered, FDIC-insured banks the same right to export interest rates as Section 85 of the National Bank Act) pursuant to Section 525 of the DIDMCA and (2) Colorado’s usury laws.… Continue Reading

We are following very closely this appeal to the 10th Circuit of the preliminary injunction issued by the Federal District Court for the District of Colorado to the plaintiffs (three trade groups) enjoining the Colorado Attorney General and UCCC Administrator from enforcing the new Colorado opt-out statute against out-of-state, state banks who made loans from out-of-state to Colorado residents.… Continue Reading

We previously reported that, on July 18, the Colorado Attorney General and UCCC Administrator appealed to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals challenging Judge Domenico’s order dated June 18 D. (Colo.) granting a preliminary injunction to the plaintiffs – trade groups precluding the defendants from enforcing Colorado’s opt-out statute (which became effective on July 1) and usury laws as to out-of-state, state banks making loans outside Colorado to Colorado residents.… Continue Reading

On April 22, 2024 (almost 2 months before Judge Daniel Domenico issued a preliminary injunction against the UCCC Administrator and Colorado Attorney General), Administrator Martha Fulford issued an Interpretive Opinion Letter regarding the Colorado opt-out law (to be codified on its effective date of July 1, 2024 as C.R.S. Section 5-13-106) (the “Colorado Opt-out Law”).… Continue Reading

The Colorado federal district court hearing NAIB, et al v. Weiser, et al., the lawsuit filed by three consumer financial services industry trade groups challenging Colorado’s opt-out legislation, has granted the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction.  As interpreted by the defendant State officials, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 5-13-106 (Opt-out Law), ), which is due to take effect on July 1, purports to apply Colorado’s interest rate and fee limits to interstate loans made by federally insured out-of-state state-chartered banks to Colorado borrowers. … Continue Reading

On May 16, the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado held a hearing in NAIB, et al v. Weiser, et al. on a motion filed by three financial services industry trade groups to preliminarily enjoin Colorado from enforcing Colo. Rev. Stat. § 5-13-106 (the “Opt-Out Legislation”) to the extent it purports to apply Colorado’s interest rate and fee limitations to loans made by federally insured out-of-state state-chartered banks to Colorado borrowers.… Continue Reading