As reported in Public Citizen’s Consumer Law & Policy Blog, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently agreed to review Chilutti v. Uber Technologies, Inc., in which a divided panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court (and later the Superior Court en banc) held that courts must apply a “stricter burden of proof” when asked to enforce an arbitration agreement in a company’s online terms and conditions because arbitration waives the constitutional right to a jury trial.… Continue Reading

On August 26, 2024, Chief Judge Randy Crane in the S.D. Texas granted summary judgment to the CFPB, denied summary judgment to the trade groups and upheld the validity of the CFPB’s small business data collection rule. However, the Judge still needs to rule on a motion to amend the complaint and a motion for judgment on the pleadings.… Continue Reading

On August 22, 2024, the CFPB filed its reply brief in support of its motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction and lift the stay of the CFPB’s credit card late fee final rule (“Rule”) in the lawsuit challenging the Rule.

On May 10, 2024, in issuing the preliminary injunction, Judge Pittman found that the plaintiffs had established a likelihood of success on the merits based solely on the Fifth Circuit’s decision in CFSA v.Continue Reading

In a surprising quick turn of events, on remand from SCOTUS, the 9th Circuit, on August 23, 2024, issued its unanimous unpublished panel opinion in Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, FSB (Kivett II) in which it essentially re-affirmed its earlier panel opinion holding that there is no preemption of a California state law which requires the payment of 2% interest on residential mortgage escrow accounts.… Continue Reading

We have previously blogged about how targets of CFPB enforcement actions have asserted that the actions must be dismissed because the investigations were conducted and the lawsuits were brought and are being prosecuted with funds unlawfully obtained from the Federal Reserve Board at a time when the Federal Reserve System had no combined earnings.… Continue Reading

On July 16, the Sixth Circuit held that the Federal Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA) does not provide for an implied right of indemnification or contribution, and preempts indemnification claims under the Michigan Electronic Funds Transfer Act (“MEFTA”) and common law, when a bank reimburses customers for unauthorized electronic transfers, even if the unauthorized transfers were caused by the entity from which indemnification is sought.… Continue Reading

On August 19, 2024, the CFPB filed its reply brief in support of the CFPB’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce (Fort Worth Chamber) for lack of standing and, if granted, transfer the case to the Federal District Court for D.C. in the lawsuit challenging the CFPB’s credit card late fee final rule (“Rule”).… Continue Reading

The Introduction to the Complaint which was filed by the CFPB on May 17, 2024 against Solo Funding, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California – Western Division Los Angeles (Judge R. Gary Klausner) describes the CFPB’s claims as follows:

INTRODUCTION

  1. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“Bureau”) brings this action under §§ 1031, 1036(a), 1054, and 1055 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA), 12 U.S.C.
Continue Reading

On August 8, 2024, the CFPB filed its Appellant Brief with the Fifth Circuit, appealing the September 2023 decision by the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas that vacated the March 2022 changes to the CFPB’s unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices (UDAAP) Exam Manual. In the 2022 amendments to the Exam Manual, the CFPB purported to use the unfair prong of UDAAP under the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA) to prohibit discriminatory conduct, whether or not it is covered by fair lending laws.… Continue Reading