On June 2, 2026, Professors Todd Zywicki and Thomas Miller, Jr., together with the Center for Individual Freedom, filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiff trade associations in National Association of Industrial Bankers, et al. v. Weiser, currently pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting en banc.… Continue Reading
amicus brief
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Amicus Brief Urges Tenth Circuit to Reject Presumption Against Preemption in Colorado DIDMCA Case
Posted in Preemption, State Regulation
The en banc Tenth Circuit continues to receive substantial support for affirming the district court’s decision in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser, the closely watched case addressing the scope of the opt-out provision in Section 525 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act’s (“DIDMCA”), which empowers a state to opt out of the interest rate provisions in Section 521 of DIDMCA with respect to “loans made in such State.”… Continue Reading
Twenty-One States File Amicus Brief Supporting Challenge to Colorado’s Effort to Regulate Interest Rates Charged by Out-of-State State Banks
The en banc proceedings in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser continue to attract significant attention. On June 4, 2026, the attorneys general of Utah and 20 other states filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit to affirm the district court’s decision enjoining Colorado’s attempt to utilize its opt out pursuant to Section 525 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (DIDMCA) as a basis to regulate the interest rates charged to Colorado borrowers by out -of-state state banks.… Continue Reading
FDIC Files Amicus Brief Supporting Challenge to Colorado’s Opt-Out Interest Rate Law
On June 4, 2026, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) filed an amicus brief in the en banc proceedings pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser, strongly supporting the plaintiffs-appellees’ challenge to Colorado’s attempt to apply its usury laws to loans made by out-of-state, state-chartered banks.… Continue Reading
OCC Files Amicus Brief Supporting Challenge to Colorado’s Opt-Out Law and Defending Longstanding Interest-Rate Exportation Principles
Posted in OCC, State Regulation
On June 4, 2026, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) filed an amicus brief in the en banc proceedings before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser, urging the court to affirm the district court’s preliminary injunction against Colorado’s opt-out statute and reject Colorado’s attempt to apply its interest-rate restrictions to loans made by out-of-state state-chartered banks.… Continue Reading
Banking Trade Groups Urge Tenth Circuit to Reject Colorado’s Attempt to Apply Its Usury Laws to Interstate Loans Made by Out-of-State State Banks
Posted in State Regulation, Usury
On June 4, 2026, the American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute, Consumer Bankers Association, America’s Credit Unions, and 52 state bankers associations filed a supplemental amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs in the en banc proceeding pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in National Association of Industrial Bankers v.… Continue Reading
Colorado “Opt-Out” Litigation – Petition for Rehearing En Banc And Amicus Briefs in Support
By Burt M. Rublin & Alan S. Kaplinsky on
Posted in Litigation and Court Decisions, State Regulation
As we previously reported, on November 10, 2025 the Tenth Circuit rendered its 2-1 decision in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser. It held that a loan is “made” for purposes of the opt-out provision in Section 525 of DIDMCA in both the state where the bank is located and the borrower’s state, meaning that Colorado’s usury limits will apply to interstate loans made to Colorado residents by out-of-state state-chartered depository institutions.… Continue Reading
Five amicus briefs filed in support of English appeal
By Barbara S. Mishkin on
Posted in CFPB General, Regulatory and Enforcement
Five amicus briefs have been filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in support of Leandra English. Ms. English has appealed the district court’s denial of her preliminary injunction motion in her action seeking a declaration that she, rather than Mick Mulvaney, has the legal right to serve as CFPB Acting Director.… Continue Reading
CFPB files amicus brief in Ninth Circuit in remanded Article III standing case
By Barbara S. Mishkin on
Posted in Credit Reports, Regulatory and Enforcement
This past May, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, ruled 6-2 that a plaintiff alleging a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation does not have standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution to sue for statutory damages in federal court unless the plaintiff can show that he or she suffered “concrete,” “real” harm as a result of the violation. … Continue Reading
CFPB files amicus brief in U.S. Supreme Court Article III standing case
By Barbara S. Mishkin on
The CFPB, together with the DOJ, has filed a second amicus brief in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, the case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court in which the issue is whether a plaintiff who cannot show any actual harm from a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) nevertheless has standing under Article III of the U.S.… Continue Reading