As we have chronicled in our blog, states are increasingly moving to fill the consumer-protection void created by the CFPB’s dramatic retreat from supervision, enforcement and rulemaking. State legislatures are considering and enacting new consumer-finance protections; state attorneys general are bringing more enforcement actions under state UDAP and other laws, often in bipartisan and multistate coalitions; and state financial regulators are expanding their supervisory and enforcement efforts.… Continue Reading

Hearing will focus on whether Section 525 permits an opt-out state to regulate loans made by out-of-state state banks

On Wednesday, September 2, the House Financial Services Committee will hold a hearing entitled “Strengthening the American Economy: Promoting Growth, Opportunity, and Prosperity.” The hearing will begin at 10:00 a.m. ET in Room 2128 of the Rayburn House Office Building.… Continue Reading

The new California Business and Consumer Services Agency (BCSA), launched on July 1, 2026, will focus on improper practices that drive costs up for state residents, agency Secretary Rohit Chopra said, in a recent blog post.

“A key priority for the agency is to crack down on harmful and corrupt practices that wrongfully raise costs for families and honest businesses,” Chopra wrote.… Continue Reading

The Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services, Division of Financial Regulation (DFR), has proposed to issue Bulletin No. DFR 2026-X, reminding nonbank “Buy Now, Pay Later” (BNPL) companies and BNPL service providers that they generally must obtain Oregon lending licenses before offering BNPL products to Oregon consumers. Unlike a few other states, Oregon has not enacted a statute that specifically applies to BNPL companies and service providers.… Continue Reading

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey has proposed regulations that would stop certain companies in the state from reporting medical debt to consumer credit agencies. 

The proposal would prohibit licensed medical care providers and debt collectors working for them from reporting medical debt to credit bureaus, intending to help patients avoid long-term financial harm after an unexpected illness or medical emergency. … Continue Reading

On May 12, 2026, we produced a 90-minute webinar in which we explored one of the most important and rapidly developing issues in consumer financial services law: coerced debt and the emerging legislative efforts designed to address it. The webinar has been re-purposed into a two-part podcast series, the first of which is being released today, June 11th, and the second of which is being released next Thursday, June 18th.… Continue Reading

On June 8, 2026, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) announced the adoption of an Interim Final Rule clarifying the authority of federal credit unions (FCUs) to impose non-interest charges and fees, including interchange fees associated with payment card transactions. The rule, which becomes effective on June 30, 2026, reinforces NCUA’s position that federal law exclusively governs FCUs’ authority to assess such fees and that state laws purporting to regulate those fees are preempted.… Continue Reading

On June 2, 2026, Professors Todd Zywicki and Thomas Miller, Jr., together with the Center for Individual Freedom, filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiff trade associations in National Association of Industrial Bankers, et al. v. Weiser, currently pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting en banc.… Continue Reading

The en banc Tenth Circuit continues to receive substantial support for affirming the district court’s decision in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser, the closely watched case addressing the scope of the opt-out provision in Section 525 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act’s (“DIDMCA”), which empowers a state to opt out of the interest rate provisions in Section 521 of DIDMCA with respect to “loans made in such State.”… Continue Reading

The en banc proceedings in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser continue to attract significant attention. On June 4, 2026, the attorneys general of Utah and 20 other states filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit to affirm the district court’s decision enjoining Colorado’s attempt to utilize its opt out pursuant to Section 525 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (DIDMCA) as a basis to regulate the interest rates charged to Colorado borrowers by out -of-state state banks.… Continue Reading