Earlier today, the Tenth Circuit entered an Order which granted the Petition for Rehearing En Banc filed by the plaintiff bank trade associations in the Colorado opt-out litigation, National Ass’n of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser. As we have previously reported, on November 10, 2025, the Tenth Circuit issued a 2-1 decision which addressed Colorado’s 2023 opt-out from Section 27 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA), pursuant to the opt-out right conferred by Section 525 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (DIDMCA).… Continue Reading
opt-out
Oregon’s DIDMCA Opt-Out Legislation Heads to the Governor’s Desk
Posted in State Regulation
As we recently reported, in the wake of the Tenth Circuit’s decision in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser, 159 F.4th 694 (10th Cir. 2025), Oregon legislators re‑introduced H.B. 4116—legislation designed to opt Oregon out of Section 521 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (DIDMCA).… Continue Reading
Moreno-Davidson Bill Seeks to Reverse Tenth Circuit and Restore Interest Rate Exportation Parity Between State and National Banks
Posted in Fair Lending, State Regulation
On February 12th, Senator Bernie Moreno (R-OH) and Representative Warren Davidson (R-OH) introduced the American Lending Fairness Act of 2026, legislation designed to restore long-standing federal interest rate exportation authority for state-chartered banks and credit unions engaged in interstate lending. The bill directly responds to the Tenth Circuit’s controversial 2-1 decision in National Association of Industrial Bankers v.… Continue Reading
Colorado Files Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Rehearing Petition in Opt-Out Litigation
By Burt M. Rublin & Alan S. Kaplinsky on
Posted in Litigation and Court Decisions
As we reported previously, a petition for rehearing en banc was filed by the plaintiff bank trade associations in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser. In that case, the panel’s 2-1 decision held that a loan is “made” for purposes of the opt-out provision in Section 525 of DIDMCA in both the state where the bank is located and the borrower’s state, meaning that Colorado interest rate limits will apply to loans made to Colorado residents by out-of-state state-chartered depository institutions.… Continue Reading
This week’s podcast episode: Have State-Chartered, FDIC-Insured Banks Finally Achieved Interstate Usury Parity with National Banks?
By Mindy Harris on
In today’s podcast, which repurposes a recent webinar, we examine the impact, if any, of a landmark opinion rendered by Judge Daniel Domenico of the Federal District Court for the District of Colorado in a case challenging recently enacted Colorado legislation on interstate loans made from outside Colorado to Colorado residents.… Continue Reading
Tenth Circuit sets briefing schedule in appeal from preliminary injunction granted to trade groups with respect to Colorado opt-out statute
We are following very closely this appeal to the 10th Circuit of the preliminary injunction issued by the Federal District Court for the District of Colorado to the plaintiffs (three trade groups) enjoining the Colorado Attorney General and UCCC Administrator from enforcing the new Colorado opt-out statute against out-of-state, state banks who made loans from out-of-state to Colorado residents.… Continue Reading
Colorado UCCC Administrator issues interpretive opinion letter regarding Colorado opt-out law
Posted in Litigation and Court Decisions, Usury
On April 22, 2024 (almost 2 months before Judge Daniel Domenico issued a preliminary injunction against the UCCC Administrator and Colorado Attorney General), Administrator Martha Fulford issued an Interpretive Opinion Letter regarding the Colorado opt-out law (to be codified on its effective date of July 1, 2024 as C.R.S. Section 5-13-106) (the “Colorado Opt-out Law”).… Continue Reading