The CFPB has published its Spring 2019 rulemaking agenda as part of the Spring 2019 Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, which is coordinated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). It represents the CFPB’s first rulemaking agenda under Director Kraninger’s leadership. The agenda’s preamble indicates that the information in the agenda is current as of March 6, 2019 and identifies the regulatory matters that the Bureau “reasonably anticipates having under consideration during the period from May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020.”… Continue Reading
rulemaking
CFPB Fall 2018 rulemaking agenda confirms plans to consider rulemaking on “abusiveness” standard
The CFPB’s Fall 2018 rulemaking agenda has been published by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) as part of its Fall 2018 Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions. (OIRA is part of the Office of Management and Budget.) It represents the CFPB’s second rulemaking agenda under the Trump Administration and Acting Director Mick Mulvaney’s leadership. … Continue Reading
Federal regulators’ Spring 2018 rulemaking agendas: items of interest to consumer financial services providers
In addition to the CFPB’s Spring 2018 rulemaking agenda that we have already blogged about, the Spring 2018 rulemaking agendas of several other federal agencies contain some items of interest to consumer financial services providers.
Items of particular interest are:
- OCC. The OCC plans to issue an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking “for modernizing the current regulations to carry out the purposes of the Community Reinvestment Act.”
CFPB seeks comment on rulemaking processes
The CFPB has issued a request for information that seeks comment on its rulemaking processes. Comments on the RFI must be received by June 7, 2018.
The RFI begins with a review of the statutory requirements that are relevant to the CFPB’s rulemaking processes. The RFI discusses the Administrative Procedure Act notice-and-comment requirements, the Regulatory Flexibility Act requirements for rulemakings that will have a significant impact on a substantial number of small business entities (often referred to as the SBREFA process), federal law requirements for various impact analyses of proposed and final rules, and federal law requirements and MOU agreements for consultation with other federal agencies.… Continue Reading
New York Regulation of Consumer Reporting Agencies Following Data Breaches
This week, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo issued a press release directing the New York Department of State to issue a new regulation impacting consumer reporting agencies. The new regulation was adopted on an emergency basis and went into immediate effect in order to protect consumers from identity theft and other potential economic harms that may arise following a data breach.… Continue Reading
FCC targets fraudulent robocalls with new call blocking rules
The FCC has issued a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Order) adopting new rules to allow voice service providers to proactively block calls from certain numbers that are suspected to be fraudulent. The November 16 Order seeks to prevent fraud or identity theft that often accompanies calls which “spoof” or manipulate Caller ID information.… Continue Reading
California and Washington, D.C. issue student loan servicing regulations
California and the District of Columbia have recently released regulations under their respective student loan servicing laws. Each is taking comments on its regulations, but whereas California has merely issued proposed regulations, the District of Columbia has issued emergency regulations that are currently in effect. A brief summary of the regulations and their effective dates appears below, with links to more detailed discussions that also note the extraordinarily small number of complaints to the CFPB from residents of these jurisdictions as well as the bizarre economic impact of these licensing regimes, which will effectively result in the Department of Education paying the administrative expenses incurred by states asserting the authority to supervise federal student loan servicers.… Continue Reading
NYDFS Proposes Regulation of Consumer Reporting Agencies
Last week, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo issued a press release directing the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) to impose new rules on consumer reporting agencies (“CRAs”). The proposed regulation would subject CRAs that issue consumer reports (as defined in a manner similar to the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act) about consumers located in New York to new requirements, including:
- Annual registration with NYDFS – such registration must identify officers and/or directors that are responsible for the CRAs’ compliance with the new regulation;
- Annual, and in some cases quarterly, information reporting requirements to NYDFS;
- NYDFS examinations to be conducted as often as NYDFS considers “necessary”;
- Prohibitions against various activities, such as including inaccurate information in a consumer report or engaging in any unfair, deceptive, abusive, and/or predatory acts or practices;
- Communicating with consumers’ authorized representatives; and
- Compliance with the newly issued NYDFS cybersecurity regulation (see Ballard alert).
CFPB Deputy Enforcement Director mum on whether CFPB will seek further review of PHH decision
During the “Developments at the CFPB” panel this morning at the Pennsylvania Bar Institute Consumer Financial Services & Banking Law Update program in Philadelphia, Jeffrey Ehrlich, the CFPB’s Deputy Enforcement Director, would not comment on whether the CFPB will seek further judicial review of the October 11 opinion of a 3-judge panel of the U.S.… Continue Reading
What the D.C. Circuit’s PHH decision means for CFPB rulemaking
In its decision last week in PHH Corporation v. CFPB, the D.C. Circuit ruled that the CFPB’s single-director-removable-only-for-cause structure is unconstitutional. While the D.C. Circuit (in footnote 19) noted that it “need not here consider the legal ramifications of our decision for past CFPB rules or for past agency enforcement actions,” we have determined that one legal ramification of the decision is greater regulatory oversight for CFPB rulemaking.… Continue Reading