DIDMCA

Subscribe to DIDMCA via RSS

As we reported previously, a petition for rehearing en banc was filed by the plaintiff bank trade associations in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser. In that case, the panel’s 2-1 decision held that a loan is “made” for purposes of the opt-out provision in Section 525 of DIDMCA in both the state where the bank is located and the borrower’s state, meaning that Colorado interest rate limits will apply to loans made to Colorado residents by out-of-state state-chartered depository institutions.… Continue Reading

As we previously reported, on November 10, 2025 the Tenth Circuit rendered its 2-1 decision in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser. It held that a loan is “made” for purposes of the opt-out provision in Section 525 of DIDMCA in both the state where the bank is located and the borrower’s state, meaning that Colorado’s usury limits will apply to interstate loans made to Colorado residents by out-of-state state-chartered depository institutions.… Continue Reading

The Tenth Circuit’s November 10 decision in National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser marks the first appellate interpretation of a state’s opt-out authority under Section 525 of DIDMCA—and it carries major implications for state banks and their fintech partners.

The court held that a loan is “made in” an opt-out state if either the lender or the borrower is located there, meaning Colorado’s usury limits apply to loans made to Colorado residents by out-of-state state banks.… Continue Reading

Very soon, briefing by the parties in the 10th Circuit will commence with respect to Colorado’s appeal of a preliminary injunction entered by the Federal District Court for the District of Colorado. The District Court enjoined the Colorado Attorney General and UCCC Administrator from applying to out-of-state, state banks making loans to Colorado residents its (1) recently enacted statute opting out of Section 521 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (the “DIDMCA”) (conferring on state-chartered, FDIC-insured banks the same right to export interest rates as Section 85 of the National Bank Act) pursuant to Section 525 of the DIDMCA and (2) Colorado’s usury laws.… Continue Reading

We are following very closely this appeal to the 10th Circuit of the preliminary injunction issued by the Federal District Court for the District of Colorado to the plaintiffs (three trade groups) enjoining the Colorado Attorney General and UCCC Administrator from enforcing the new Colorado opt-out statute against out-of-state, state banks who made loans from out-of-state to Colorado residents.… Continue Reading

The 1978 landmark opinion in Marquette National Bank v. First of Omaha Service Corp held that under the National Bank Act, a national bank has the right to export the interest rate authorized by the state where the bank is located to borrowers located elsewhere. Section 521 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”) conferred equivalent rate exportation powers on state-chartered, FDIC-insured banks.… Continue Reading

The 1978 landmark opinion in Marquette National Bank v. First of Omaha Service Corp held that under the National Bank Act, a national bank has the right to export the interest rate authorized by the state where the bank is located to borrowers located elsewhere. Section 521 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”) conferred equivalent rate exportation powers on state-chartered, FDIC-insured banks.… Continue Reading

Here is an update on the lawsuit filed by three trade associations against the Colorado Attorney General and UCCC Administrator challenging the application of the Colorado opt-out statute to out-of-state, state chartered, FDIC-insured banks.

On June 18, 2024, Judge Domenico from the U.S. District Court for Colorado issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the Colorado Attorney General and UCCC Administrator from enforcing the Colorado statute opting out of Section 521 of DIDMCA against members of the plaintiff trade associations who make loans from outside Colorado to Colorado residents.… Continue Reading

On April 22, 2024 (almost 2 months before Judge Daniel Domenico issued a preliminary injunction against the UCCC Administrator and Colorado Attorney General), Administrator Martha Fulford issued an Interpretive Opinion Letter regarding the Colorado opt-out law (to be codified on its effective date of July 1, 2024 as C.R.S. Section 5-13-106) (the “Colorado Opt-out Law”).… Continue Reading

The Colorado federal district court hearing NAIB, et al v. Weiser, et al., the lawsuit filed by three consumer financial services industry trade groups challenging Colorado’s opt-out legislation, has granted the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction.  As interpreted by the defendant State officials, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 5-13-106 (Opt-out Law), ), which is due to take effect on July 1, purports to apply Colorado’s interest rate and fee limits to interstate loans made by federally insured out-of-state state-chartered banks to Colorado borrowers. … Continue Reading